Being quasiperiodic structures of an intermediate state between
the completely periodic crystals and the disordered
amorphous solids, it is natural to associate them with
quasicrystals. As is well known, the theoretical
understanding of quasicrystals is based on the nonperiodic
tiling of the plane due to Penrose. The one-dimensional version of
these quasiperiodic structures, the Fibonacci lattices, was
treated by Kohmoto, Kadanoff, and Tang in 1983 [8], and their
method is called the ``KKT method." We are going to present this
method applied to the analysis of the behavior of a particle
subject to a potential
In quantum mechanics, this behavior is described by the
one-dimensional Schrodinger equation (5.1)
As is known, the mathematical normalization of the eigenfunctions
It is not possible to solve exactly equation (5.1), so the
discretized version of it is the following
Equation (5.1) may be written as
where is the
``transfer matrix"
Successive applications of the transfer matrices give
In order to get the energy spectrum, we look for solutions
that do not grow exponentially. Since each
is a
matrix with determinant equal to 1 (unimodular), the
condition for
to be in the spectrum i.e. to be an allowed
energy is
Summarizing, the KKT method applied to the study of the electronic
properties of a one-dimensional quasicrystal is equivalent to
calculating products of transfer matrices. The results indicate
that the wave functions are either fractal or chaotic, and show a
``critical" behavior. The energy spectrum is a Cantor set
with zero Lebesgue measure and the density of states at energy
is concentrated with an index
(of the
multifractal Procaccia decomposition [9], which takes
values in a range
The
fractal dimensions
of these singularities in the
Cantor set are also calculated, and the numerical values are all
functions of powers of the Golden Mean
Let us quote some curious results about the continued fraction
expansion of powers of the Golden Mean
In general case, we prove that
Also, it is easily to deduce by induction the following formula
for Lucas numbers [31]:
Indeed, we have
Now we obtain (5.6):
Let us prove (5.7). Using (5.8) gives
Setting
we have
Thus, in the case of even powers, the continued fraction is
periodic, being the first coefficient of the sum of the two
forming the period, while in the case of uneven powers, the
continued fraction is purely periodic. Let us add that this
behavior is found only when integer powers of are
considered. If instead we develop an irrational power of
like
This subject needs much more research: the question of explaining this fascinating behavior remains open.